Over the course of my career, I’ve seen such a shift in approaches to how we develop applications. I was raised in the traditional waterfall method, like many of us. Then I experienced the agile method and saw its benefits as well as limitations. Today, as a CIO overseeing large teams and diverse organizational needs, I see the need for both methods to co-exist and to cross-pollinate. But can they co-exist when they are so different? I’d love to hear your experiences.
How can agile and traditional waterfall development methodologies co-exist?
UC IT NewsFebruary 20, 2014All Articlescollaboration, Tom Andriola, UC CIO
- ANNOUNCEMENT: UC Tech Awards 2025 applications now open through March 3 – APPLY NOW
- ANNOUNCEMENT: 2025 UC Tech Calendar – What to expect in the year ahead
- NEWS: Creating a Smarter University: AI Transformations in Administration workshop – Visual Recap
- NEWS: 2024 – A Transformative Year for Tech at UC
- EVENT: UCSF Innovation Showcase and Reception at JP Morgan 2025: January 15 – JOIN MAILING LIST
- RESOURCE: UC AI Workshop at UCLA – Summary report
- SURVEY: Share your feedback about Deloitte
- NEWS: Diwali 2024 celebration at UC Office of the President highlights shared values
- NEWS: California National Primate Research Center (CNPRC), “Hydra” Development Team at UC Davis wins UC Tech Larry L. Sautter Silver Award in 2024
- NEWS: Professional Growth and Transformative Learning Opportunities with Powerful Impact – UC Tech Academy